2026 Maritime Digest of Arbitration Awards and Court Rulings

MTM Mississippi Pte Ltd v. SeaRiver Maritime LLC (The “MTM Mississippi”) – SMA No. 4507 – 20 August 2025

EXXONMOBILVOY2012 – DEMURRAGE – HALF-RATE DISPUTE – BAD WEATHER EXCLUSIONS

The vessel MTM Mississippi was chartered for the carriage of clean petroleum products from the U.S. Gulf to Chile. Owner claimed a principal balance of $40,516.66 in unpaid demurrage, while Charterer denied liability and counterclaimed for an alleged $11,441.36 overpayment. Both parties sought costs and attorney’s fees.

ASBATANKVOY 2025: Modernizing a Maritime Standard and Reframing “Once on Demurrage, Always on Demurrage”

ASBATANKVOY – CHARTERPARTY – ONCE ON DEMURRAGE – TIME BAR – DEMURRAGE – LAYTIME

We have carefully evaluated the key laytime and demurrage implications as the market shifts from the original ASBATANKVOY to this new version.  Find yourself with more detailed questions?  Shoot us an email at info@haugenconsulting.com. We will be happy to discuss the changes with you and their specific implications for your business.

Tiger Ship No. 8 Limited v. Vinmar International Limited (The “Tiger Integrity”) – SMA No. 4499 – 24 March 2025

ASBATANKVOY – DEMURRAGE – NON-PARTICIPATION BY RESPONDENT
Tiger Ship No. 8 brought a claim against Vinmar International under a voyage charterparty dated October 19, 2022, for the chemical tanker Tiger Integrity. The charter involved shipment of chemical cargoes loaded at three Chinese ports (Jiangyin, Jingjiang, and Mailiao) and discharged at three Indian ports (JNPT, Hazira, and Kandla). The Owners claimed $127,451.24 in demurrage following delays at the load and discharge ports.

Maritima del Pacifico SAP.I. de C.V. v. Aerovolte SA de C.V. and Cal-lxa Aggregates LLC, (The “PATAGONMAN”) – SMA No. 4498 – 3 February 2025

GENCON – COA – DEMURRAGE – DETENTION – MITIGATION

This arbitration involved claims by Linea Maritima del Pacifico against Aerovolte and its guarantor, Cal-lxa, under a Contract of Affreightment for transporting aggregate between Mexican ports. The dispute arose when Aerovolte failed to provide cargo, leaving the chartered vessel MV Patagonman idle at Veracruz; Claimant later re-delivered the vessel and sought $672,388 in damages.

Bunge SA v Pan Ocean Co Ltd (The “Sagar Ratan”) [2025] EWHC 193 (Admiralty)

Charterparty – Amended NYPE 1946 form – COVID-19 PCR test certification – Rejection at Chinese port – Owner’s Deviation – Seaworthy – Off-hire

This case was an appeal of London Arbitration 8/25, which arose from a dispute under a time charterparty involving the vessel Sagar Ratan, concerning whether the vessel was off-hire during a delay caused by a Covid-19 outbreak among the crew. The vessel had been chartered by disponent owners to the charterers under an NYPE form for a one-time trip from the Philippines to China via Australia.

London Arbitration 8/25

Charterparty – Amended NYPE 1946 form – COVID-19 PCR test certification – Rejection at Chinese port – Owner’s Deviation – Seaworthy – Off-hire
A vessel chartered under an amended NYPE 1946 form was denied entry to Nanjing, China, because eight newly joined crew members lacked PCR certificates meeting local COVID-19 entry requirements. The vessel had to divert to Busan for testing before returning to Nanjing, causing delay and additional costs. Charterers sought damages, arguing the vessel was unfit for service on arrival, while Owners contended that compliance with local health regulations was the Charterers’ responsibility and that the PCR certificates were not required under the charterparty’s definition of “international certificates.”

London Arbitration 7/25

Amended NYPE 1993 form – Final hire accounts – Off-hire – Underperformance claim – Weather evidence – Definition of “about” – Definition of “up to” – Adverse current – Stevedore damage – Bunkering incident – Master’s discretion – Burden of proof – LMAA FALCA Rules
The dispute arose under a time charter based on the amended NYPE 1993 form. Issues included vessel performance claims based on speed and consumption warranties, damage allegedly caused by stevedores during cargo operations, and a bunkering incident where parted mooring ropes led to an aborted operation and crew injury. The parties presented evidence such as weather routing reports, master’s logs, surveyor findings, and documentation to support their respective claims and defenses.

London Arbitration 6/25

NYPE 1993 – TIME CHARTER – OFF HIRE – OWNERS’ DEVIATION – WEATHER ROUTING COMPANY – WRC
A dispute arose under a time charter trip on an amended NYPE 1993 form for a voyage from Terneuzen, Netherlands to Jacksonville, Florida. The charter included a laycan of 4 to 8 February and an expected duration of about 25 days WOG. Following redelivery on 6 March, the owners claimed a balance of US$119,557.65 primarily for hire and bunkers, while the charterers denied liability, arguing the master unjustifiably deviated from their routing instructions, causing delays and additional costs.

Linea Maritima del Pacifico SAP.I. de C.V. v Aerovolte SA de C.V., with Cal-lxa Aggregates LLC as Guarantor, (The “Sider Bilbao”) – SMA No. 4497 – 3 February 2025

GENCON – LAYTIME – DEMURRAGE – INTEREST – COSTS – ATTORNEYS’ FEES
This arbitration involves a claim by Linea Maritima, disponent owner of the MV SIDER BILBAO against Aerovolte and Cal-lxa for demurrage in the amount of $328,584.51, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, under a GENCON charterparty dated May 29, 2023. Between July and September 2023, the SIDER BILBAO completed eight voyages under the Charter. Demurrage incurred over this period totaled $478,398.48, of which Cal-lxa made a partial payment of $149,813.97, leaving an outstanding balance of $328,584.51.

Union Bulk A/S v Twin Rivers Co., Inc. (The “Agali”) – SMA 4501 – 10 April 2025

GENCON – DEMURRAGE – FREIGHT
This dispute arose under a voyage charterparty recap dated April 21, 2023, incorporating GENCON and sub-charter terms, between Union Bulk and Twin Rivers Co., for a single voyage of the M/V AGALI carrying a cargo of aggregates from Kingston, Jamaica to Wilmington, North Carolina, later amended to include Savannah, Georgia as a discharge port for additional freight. The Owners sought to recover outstanding demurrage and freight totaling $279,959.95, together with interest, attorneys’ fees, and arbitration costs.