Gantrade Corp. v. Pakistan Synthetics, Ltd. (The “Stolt Advance”) – SMA No. 3170, 1 May 1995

ASBATANKVOY — DEMURRAGE — DISPORT — VOYAGE — LAYTIME — ARBITRATION — Seller Award

Although the Buyers understand their contractual obligation to pay demurrage for delays at disport, they claim that this voyage’s delays were caused by government action and likewise a laytime exception. Additionally, the Buyers argue that they are not bound by the Panel’s decision because they never agreed to arbitration.

To access this post, you must purchase Annual Subscription or 2 Year Subscription.