Category: Archive

AMWELSH – CANCELLED / REPUDIATED CHARTER PARTY – MITIGATED LOSSES – BALLAST VOYAGE – SUBSTITUTE EMPLOYMENT – POSITIONING VOYAGE

Upon cancelling the charter party during loading Charterer instructed Owner to mitigate losses by seeking other cargos. Owner repositioned the original vessel and had a sister ship sail a ballast voyage to the delivery location of the follow on time charter of the original ship.  Owner claimed for lost income and bunker costs due to repositioning.

ASBATANKVOY – COLLISION – ALLISION – SHIP TO SHIP (STS) – SAFE BERTHING / SHIFTING – GENERAL EXCEPTIONS – CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE – SEAWORTHY – INCOMPETENCE – LANGUAGE BARRIER – DEMURRAGE – DAMAGES

Prior to a Ship to Ship Transfer a supply boat collided with the tanker (“Agathonissos”) it was sent to support.  The Agathonissos subsequently was delayed in lightering the vessel to be lightered (VTBL) which, being needed elsewhere, lightered to a replacement lightering tanker.  The replacement lightering tanker eventually lightering to the Agathonissos after the Agathonissos was repaired.  The owner of the Agathonissos alleged the supply vessel was unseaworthy due to its crew and held the Agathonissos’s charterer liable.  The charterer alleged the same of the Agathonissos.  Charterer also attempted to rely upon clauses 6 and 7 of ASBATANKVOY to deduct time from counting.  Owner pointed to two clauses in the C/P, Clauses 9 and 19 of ASBATANKVOY, within which the charterer assumes the risk and peril of a lightering and neither party is to be held liable under certain circumstances.

EXXONMOBILVOY2005 – DEMURRAGE – DELAY DUE TO FOG – WHETHER GALENA PARK A PORT OR IN THE PORT OF HOUSTON – WHETHER HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL A RIVERPORT – RIVERPORT CLAUSE – DISPUTE OVER BURDEN OF PROOF – Charterer Award

When charterer deducted fifty percent of a delay due to fog basis an exceptions clause, owner countered that the Houston Ship Channel was a riverport and thus the “Riverport(s) Clause” applied with the weather delay subsequently counting in full.  In addressing this question, the Panel also advised as to where the burden of proof would lie and whether Galena Park was a port.

FOB SALE – VESSEL ARRIVING LATE – SECOND VESSEL NOMINATED – CONTRACT AMENDED FOR NEW LAYCAN – PRODUCER’S MARKETER CLAIMED DAMAGES FOR ALLEGED EFFORTS TO AVOID PLANT SHUTDOWN – BUYER CLAIMED FOR DEMURRAGE AND DAMAGES DUE TO MISSED OPPORTUNITY

A contract was fixed for the sale of ammonium sulfate to be loaded in Pasadena, Texas. After the originally nominated vessel was to miss the laycan, a replacement vessel was nominated. The contract was then re-negotiated with a new window and cargo quantity. Later, the producer’s marketer claimed for damages incurred when several barges were loaded to avoid a plant shutdown. The buyer claimed for demurrage and damages due to a missed opportunity.

TIME CHARTER – VESSEL CRANE FAILURE – UNABLE TO USE 1 HOLD ON THE SHIP – CHARTERER WITHHELD A PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF HIRE – OWNER BELIEVED HIRE DUE IN FULL – CHARTERER GOING OUT OF BUSINESS – PARTIAL AWARD FOR SECURITY Although continuing to trade, due to a crane breakdown onboard a time chartered vessel...

BPVOY4 – “ALL INCLUSIVE” FREIGHT COVERING ALL COSTS OF VOYAGE – RIVER BERTH REQUIRING STANDBY TUGS

Afforded a range of ports within the fixture recap, Charterer directed the Vessel to a river berth wherein due to high current, standby tugs were required. Owner claimed the cost of the standby tugs from Charterer. Charterer pointed to freight being “ALL INCLUSIVE” and thus covering all costs of the voyage inclusive of standby tugs.